WORKING
GT 1 - History of anthropology backgrounds, borders and approaches in knowledge production processes
Alejandra Roca (roca.ale @ gmail.com)
Paul Perazzi ( pabloperazzi@yahoo.com.ar) Maria Julia
Name (julianame79@yahoo.com.ar)
Commentators: Susan Margulies (FFyL-UBA), Alicia Martín (FFyL-UBA)
The Working Group intends further to the space formed in the V Conference of Social Anthropology research conducted in 2008 with the aim of promoting exchange on studies concerning the history of anthropology and the constitution and the conceptual and theoretical trajectory of the discipline. The interest in clarifying aspects of the disciplinary past is not a local phenomenon not only relative to the anthropological field but is a widespread intellectual practice in all disciplines and fields of knowledge. We propose to discuss the history of anthropology in response to the continuities, discontinuities, the construction of "facts" scientists and the main core of debate and tension in the political and institutional contexts, understanding such debates as a cardinal political reading exercise that helps to resize the contemporary professional practices.
opens the call to the call for papers that problematize the history of anthropology and the construction of knowledge around the following key theoretical and historical: a) approaches or possibilities of approaching the historical perspective, historiographic and methodological discussions; b ) conceptual paths, such as the relationship of biology and society, race, body, technology, among others, and trajectories of objects and allowed problems as objects of knowledge in anthropology, and c) practices and knowledge production processes, including analysis of historical, political and institutional development of the anthropological sciences, developments " inside "the discipline, the path of significant figures, the processes of" reception "of certain theoretical trends and the emergence of specific fields of study and practice in anthropology.
GT 2 - Ethnographies of violence, conflict management and bureaucracies
Sofia Tiscornia (smteb@yahoo.com.ar) María Victoria
Pita (mpita@filo.uba.ar)
María Josefina Martínez (josefina@filo.uba.ar)
Discussants: María José Sarrabayrouse (FFyL-UBA), Carla Villalta (FFyL-UBA), María Inés Pacecca (FFyL-UBA)
The working group proposes to continue the discussions in previous days and to this end the call for the presentation of works aimed to discuss the political and cultural conditions of the problem of state violence as a process establishing social relationships.
papers are expected to gather from an ethnographic perspective, to develop the economic analysis of the dimension history of state violence, the judicial intervention in the management of social conflicts, the state regulatory policies of the protest and social conflict, practices and procedures for action by the security forces on groups and social groups, the reform processes police forces, security and armed forces, the analysis of political intervention and judicial organizations and human rights groups and social activists on issues of violence and security.
receive jobs is also proposed that problematize research files, documents and records produced by state bureaucracies.
GT 3 - Anthropology and Education: research debates the changing socio-educational contexts
Gabriela Novaro (cairnova@arnet.com.ar)
Liliana Sinisi (lilianasinisi@speedy.com.ar)
Silvana Campanini (scampanini@filo.uba . ar)
Commentators: Graciela Batallán (FFY L-UBA), María Rosa Neufeld (FFyL-UBA), Ana Padawan (FFyL-UBA), Laura Santillán (FFyL-UBA)
group Anthropology and Education, ensure specific analysis and approach to a set of issues, structure your table themes, detailed below. Are expected to be product presentations theoretical reflection and research processes of an ethnographic / qualitative.
Axis 1: Intercultural and education. This axis aims to converge research that addresses issues such as identity processes, education and representation of the diversity and experiences of schooling and non-formal learning experiences for indigenous children and migrants, patterns of socialization and upbringing in schools and other training spaces etc.
Axis 2: anthropological contributions around the school experience and daily life in contexts of diversity and social inequality: This axis aims to bring together research on urban and rural contexts popular the daily lives of families, children and young people develop their lives in conditions of inequality and cultural diversity and the forms assumed by the school experience. Also interested in the analysis of state intervention through various policies and processes of appropriation / resistance of such policies by the subjects involved.
Axis 3: The role of children and youth in the socio-formal and informal education: It calls for the submission of work which links the problems of children and youth, adolescents and their relationship with the educational and socio-political and formal or informal. The diversity of actions and proposals that involve the younger generations is an instance for reflection about the practices, interpretations and forms of organization at this stage of life and, finally, the social controversy surrounding the role assigned to the new generations in the process which they participate.
GT 4 - Anthropology of health, illness and care. Social responses
Nélida Barber (nelbarbe@yahoo.com.ar)
María Guadalupe García (mguadagar@yahoo.com.ar) White
Carrozzi (blcarrozzi@yahoo.com) Cynthia
Fortuna River (cynthiadrf@gmail.com )
Discussants: Silvia Citro (FFyL-UBA), Maria Laura Recoder (FFyL-UBA), Susan Margulies (FFyL-UBA), Mabel Grimberg (FFyL-UBA), Marta Schapira (UNR), Ariel Adaszko (FFyL-UBA)
This group invites the presentation and discussion of experiences in research and intervention in the area of \u200b\u200bthe anthropology of health and medical anthropology. It is proposed to analyze the diversity of problems related to the construction of individual and collective responses to suffering, illness and death in different contexts, and reflection on the theoretical and methodological problems in addressing the different dimensions processes of health, illness and attention.
call upon the presentation of papers in the following areas: a) The political anthropology and the field of health: policies, institutional practices and collective action, b) Body and daily life in the experience of illness, c) Medicine, medical care and knowledge and professional practices; d) Ethnography in anthropology of health.
GT 5 - Sexuality, Relationship & Politics from a Gender Perspective Deborah
Daich (deborahdaich@yahoo.com.ar) Marcelo
Zelarallán (marcelo.zel @ gmail.com)
Deborah Rifkin (debyrifkin @ yahoo. com) Ivana
Otero (Ivanaotero@gmail.com)
Discussants: Monica Tarducci (FFyL-UBA/UNSAM), Silvana Darré (FLACSO / Uruguay) and Adriana Cause (UBA, UNSAM)
Guest: Adriana Piscitelli (University of Campinas)
believe
Gender is a fundamental analytical tool for understanding social reality, allowing us to complicate the issue of power and hierarchies among human beings, as well as ethnicity, class, age, sex, and others, which intersect and unfold in a manner inseparable. Use
gender perspective is critical and questioning way politicize both daily life and relationships de-naturalize social areas considered "intimate" as revealed in the traditionally public. Build a knowledge on the set of rules, practices, symbols, and values \u200b\u200bcreated from the sexual difference and have a practical impact on the lives of all people, adult or not, are defined as male, female or prefer different Categories trans.
then call to social scientists to share a critical space in which to discuss our research on sexuality, family structures and arrangements, social movements that include (or exclude) gender demands and movements for sexual and reproductive rights, among others, whether you are try to recover the senses work and practices of different social agents that focus on public policies and institutional practices and discourses on these issues.
GT 6 - Ethnicities and territories
redefinition Valeria Iñigo Carrera (valsic@yahoo.com)
Carenzo Sebastian (sebastián.carenzo @ gmail.com)
Sebastian Valverde (sebavalverde@yahoo.com.ar)
Commentators: Hugo Trinchero (FFyL-UBA), Juan Carlos Radovich (FFyL-UBA), Ivanna Petz (FFyL-UBA)
In recent years, the dynamics of capital accumulation has included the development of multiple demonstrations based on "ethnicity", of increasing importance. In other words, the "emergent ethnicity" becomes a prevalent feature in the economic, political and social constituencies of contemporary society. The expansion of the agricultural frontier conversions to regional agricultural structures, territorial reconfigurations, the privatization of land, public policy interventions and / or private, population relocation process, the redefinition of productive practices of households, in short, the transformation of the capital / labor go through the configuration process ethnicities. The working group's proposal is to gather research and discuss the various processes that take shape in the context of interethnic relations, discussing the realities, conflicts, Historicizing everyday life, distorting the speeches, probing beyond the obvious.
GT 7 - Anthropology and Migration Processes
María Inés Pacecca (antropologia.migracion @ gmail.com)
Corina Courtis (antropologia.migracion @ gmail.com)
Alejandro Goldberg (antropologiaymigraciones@filo.uba.ar)
The Working Group on "Anthropology and Migration Processes" invite researchers and researchers of migration to submit papers for the Sixth Conference. With special interest in strengthening the anthropological perspective in the study of migration processes, as on previous occasions, this panel hopes to promote exchange, debate and reflection about the many dimensions of these processes. Migration, emigration and immigration are complex phenomena that affect various areas of the societies of origin and destination: families, households, gender relations, territories, communities, job and housing markets, demographic structures, rights and access to services such as social assistance health and education, intra and inter-cultural relations, associations and public practice, among others. The Working Group proposal also seeks to recover and discuss the role and dynamics of regulatory and control structures of national States, the incidence of supranational bodies and civil society organizations and based on the various aspects of interaction, dispute and conflict between "natives" and "foreigners."
GT 8 - ethnographic perspective on the process of mobilization, collective political schemes and government spaces
Virginia Manzano (virginiamanzan@gmail.com)
Mary Ines Fernandez Alvarez (mifernandezalvarez@gmail.com)
Matías Triguboff (mtriguboff@yahoo.com.ar)
Juan José Gregoric (juanjogregoric@yahoo.com.ar)
Commentators: Mabel Grimberg (FFyL-UBA), Gloria Rodriguez ( UNR), Astor Massetti (IGG, FCSO, UBA), Juan Manuel Gouarnalusse (FFyL-UBA)
This working group continues to exchange initiated in previous days, and aims to gather ethnographic research to address organizational settings and processes social mobilization, the spaces of government and state regulation and their possible relationships. We call
papers which deal, in different historical moments and contexts regional construction dispute spaces and configuration of political ties around issues such as employment, housing, leisure, land, health, identity, family, environment, natural resources, etc.
works that problematize particular interest: a) The forms and codes of protest as "occupations" of public and private spaces, public demonstrations, encampments, strikes, etc., The rituals and symbolism in the use of space and body the language of protest. b) The construction process demands that emphasize the weight of state policies and the use of statistical devices, or other technologies specific for the formulation and submission of these claims. c) Forms of incorporation of the players: identification processes, the place of memory and traditions, narratives and life histories, practices and meanings of militancy and activism in contemporary instances of social mobilization. d) the practices of production and collective management, cooperatives, factories or companies recovered, productive enterprises, dining, fairs, self-built housing, etc. e) The areas of interaction between different levels of government and social movements created as instances of "participation" and / or co-management " policies, programs and projects: family and state regulations and collective modes of administration of various public policies, the process of incorporation of social movement activists and state agencies and programs working arrangements and political relations.
GT 9 - Ethnographic Perspectives on Labour and workers
Alejandro Balazote (abalazot@fibertel.com.ar)
Analía García (analiagarcia9@fibertel.com.ar)
Sandra Wolanski (sandrawolanski @ Argentina. com)
Commentators: Lara Bersted (FFyL-UBA), María Inés Fernández Álvarez (FFyL-UBA), Luis Guilherme de Assis (University of Brasilia)
This working group intends to continue the space of reflection initiated in previous days, about the characteristics and contemporary processes that concern the work and workers as well as different ways to approach these in the context of social anthropology. Considering the variability of the current work-related experiences, we recognize different levels of analysis on which we invited researchers to address the problem: a) Work within the productive processes in order on the capital-labor logic: dynamic capitalist and conditions of access and retention in employment (Outsourcing, concentration and centralization) and job settings from the fluctuating dynamics of capital. b) Experience in building business links, strategies of resistance and demands in relation to work and trade union. Collective forms of production, cooperatives, factories, productive enterprises. c) workers' experiences within the contemporary work processes, disciplines, knowledge and affection at work. d) The anthropological perspective on the world of work and its relationship to other areas of social life.
In this framework, we start from a theoretical and methodological by placing work as a problem in which link different areas of life. On the one hand, the long tradition of social sciences in its approach as well as the challenge in today's world require an updated look and interdisciplinary. Furthermore, from an ethnographic work appears located in the heart of relationships that determine the experience, in the framework of institutions and assumptions of life are not necessarily governed by the dynamics of production. In this way, we invite reflection on the workforce that will integrate analytically often separated areas (economics, politics, culture) as instances embodied in the experience of workers.
GT 10 - ethnographic and comparative perspectives in the analysis of political processes
Mauricio Boivin (mboivin@fibertel.com.ar)
Fernando Alberto Balbi (fabalbi@yahoo.com.ar)
Julieta Gaztañaga (satarsa \u200b\u200b@ gmail . com)
Commentators: Beatriz Heredia (IFCS-UFRJ), Ana Rosato (FCS-UBA/FTS-UNER), Laura Ferrero (FFyL-UBA)
Almost sixty years of the establishment of anthropology as a specialty policy significantly the potential of ethnographic analysis for anthropological study of politics seems to lie in a combination of three crucial features: the way that focuses its attention on the perspectives of the actors understood as part of events to consider, the adoption of a procedural standpoint, and the use of comparison as a methodological tool in the very course of ethnographic analysis. Thus, ethnography becomes a privileged resource to expose the contingency-social and historical meanings of the concepts usually associated with our understanding of the political life ('political' state ',' government ', etc.). , to consider the ways that are socially produced, operated and played, and analyze the institutions, forms of social action and types of social relations that make reference. This WG welcomes submissions devoted to ethnographic and comparative analysis of political processes and the theoretical and methodological problems that such work entails. The main topics to be considered are: a) The social production of 'political dominance' and their 'limits'. Production and imposition of social representations in the context of political processes. Native conceptions of 'politics', the 'state', 'civil society', the 'public', the 'private', etc., Attachment, self-ascription, exclusion and self-exclusion actors in these areas. Relations between actors and institutions 'specialized' (parties, unions, NGOs, etc..) And unskilled activities 'political', its links with government institutions (lobbyists, public office and community leaders, NGOs, etc. ; forms of protest, etc..). b) The policy within and across state institutions: disputes over control of institutional, development, design and implementation of 'public policy', processes of organization and reform of public bodies, etc.. c) theoretical and methodological debates on ethnographic analysis political process: anthropology 'political' and 'policy', the ethnographic analysis against the political and state institutions contemporary and past, problems of scale and comparative ethnographic analysis of political processes.
GT 11 - Culture and Territory. cultural policies, social practices, diversity and exclusion Lacarrieu
Monica (mobla@uolsinectis.com.ar)
Rubens Bayardo (rbayardo@fibertel.com.ar)
Claudio Lobell (clobeto@filo.uba.ar)
Commentators: Marian Moya (FFyL-UBA), Ana Wortman (iigg, UBA) and Ana M. Spadafora (FFyL-UBA)
gone on a world map and reshaped by transnational flows of different order, heavyweight actors like international organizations, governments, banks and widespread use of terms such as "the anthropological concept of culture," " cultural diversity "," cultural development ". Among other social actors have become common place emphasis on "culture", "cultural identity", "cultural rights". The 'culture' is not only repeatedly invoked by social actors of different types and sectors, but around it are deployed numerous activities, projects, plans and conflicts of various kinds, usually associated with social transformation, and appropriation of land and construction. The arts, heritage, cultural industries, cultural tourism, memory, traditions, crafts, popular celebrations are the subject of cultural policies 'from above' and 'from below', and management practices more or less professionalized instrumentalize that to achieve other ends. Oriented economic restructuring, urban development and regional integration of the excluded, the recognition of consensus, groups or minorities, the narrowing of inequalities, the cure of the 'ills social ', the "cultural resource" is at once disputed by the senses and the hierarchies of "real" and the prevalence of different social projects underway. Axes
problematic: a) Culture, territory and development; b) Culture as "resource" social actors, practices and representations; c) Cultural diversity and social exclusion; d) Cultural Economics, cultural policies and cultural management, e) Policies identity politics of memory, politics of place, f) heritage, arts and crafts, cultural industries, cultural tourism, g) Cultural and social requalification process and urban relegation.
GT 12 - Studies of Heritage and cultural productions
Monica Rotman (mobea@fibertel.com.ar)
Alicia Martin (alicia@inapl.gov.ar)
Discussants: Lisa Raggio (FFyL-UBA) Carolina Crespo (FFyL-UBA), Cecilia Benedetti (FFyL-UBA), Marcela Andrade Pais (FSOC / FFyL-UBA), Lara Bersted (FFyL-UBA), Laura Cardini (UNR)
This working group is proposed as a space for exchange and reflection on the recent dynamics that integrate processes and cultural production patrimonial processes of broader social transformation. The changes can transcend merely symbolic vision of culture, expanding the debate on economic and political aspects.
The current relevance of the cultural dimension close ties with the issue of equity. Both are significant transformations in recent decades regarding its conceptualization, as well as visibility and outreach has taken on the subject, which is located on the public agenda as a treatment for forms of cultural diversity.
Since the proposed approach, in our topic of interest are included processes of production, circulation and consumption culture. Also, since public policy the "culture industry" is being actively appealed as a development mechanism and the empowerment of minorities in the context of cultural diversity. From this perspective, the field of cultural policies is not an exclusive ground state, but an arena of negotiations between state and society.
opens the call to the receipt of papers analyzing cultural and patrimonial processes contemporaries, both in its historic, social, economic and political, as looking at the various agencies and points of reference in such processes as well as research that problematize aspects methodology and concepts in the implementation and management of heritage and culture, nor to evaluate and discuss the emergence of new problems.
GT 13 - Perspectives ethnographic studies of science, technology and innovation
Cecilia Hidalgo (chidalgo@filo.uba.ar)
Alejandra Roca (roca.ale @ gmail.com) Adriana
Stagnaro ( astagnaro@sinectis.com.ar)
Commentator: Felix G. Schuster (FFyL-UBA), Guillermo Ruben (UNICAMP)
This group invited to attend researchers interested in the anthropological reflection on the cultural, social, symbolic, historical, political and economic scientific-technological field. Anthropology of science, technology and innovation has deepened the analysis of specific processes and practices and laboratory ethnographies, the interaction of technology with daily life of individuals and their bodies, the introduction of new technologies in globalized production processes, the modalities of cooperation relevant to the production of knowledge, forms of legitimation of scientific authority, building nests in the fields of scientific production technology and the construction of meaning around these processes. Given the relationship
dynamics between philosophy, history of science and anthropology of science, we call also the submission of papers to substantiate and characterize the interaction between these different approaches to discipline. It was also accepted contributions that anchor these debates in the history of anthropological theory and in field development studies of science and technology in Latin America.
GT 14 - The mediation of technology in anthropological research
Dr. Marian Moya (mmoyac@gmail.com)
Prof. Jimena Vazquez (jipimepe@gmail.com)
Commentators: Carlos Masotta (INAPL- CONICET) Ana Wortman (iigg, FSOC-UBA)
mediation technologies found in all areas of daily life: the technologies are a vital part of the everyday social groups and, therefore, are structured - mediate, while the universes of discourse and meanings, socioeconomic and political processes and even transnational flows. They also allow the emergence of new spaces for socialization and interaction (such as "blogs", "Facebook", "chat rooms") but also the transformation of existing forms of social relationship (eg communities that occur after the use of "fotolog").
technologies mediate our lives and therefore our field work does not remain outside the mediation. For example, in contact with different subjects by mail or telephone, to go to the field with a camera or video, or to participate in discussion forums and communities of chat from the use of the Internet.
In this sense, we can not think without questioning our anthropological practice: 1) how the technological means operating in the social experience, 2) how to cross the construction technologies of our field and how they complement the traditional fieldwork today (contacted and eventually informants interviewed via phone, for example), 3) data collection from other sources, 4) processing the data gathered in the field, use of specialized software and 5) the transmission of anthropological knowledge (samples of videos, photos, discussion sessions from a projection, etc.)..
Thus, we propose in this working group to encourage discussion and reflection on the priorities with the main purpose of thinking in depth anthropological practice technologically mediated. This analysis on the mediation of technology in anthropological field work aims to incorporate the discussions of both the epistemological framework (Anthropological production contexts: for example the use of concepts like "cyber" "virtual ethnography", "visual code, etc..) And the methodology (the application of different technical devices, cell phone, computer, Internet, camera video, etc .- in the work of the anthropologist).
GT 15 - Anthropology and Image
Carmen Guarini (cguarini@filo.uba.ar)
Marina Gutierrez de Angelis (marinagutierrez@fibertel.com.ar)
Andrea Molfetta (andreamilfetta@ig.com.br)
Clearly the important role visual images played in our culture today. The formats are multiplied and the forms of media also. We can not only talk about movies, we talk about photography, imagery, video, hypertext and the Internet. The popularization and increased use of audiovisual technology translates not only in the diversification of film production but the emergence of media as the Internet and the proliferation of new practices of presentation and representation as YouTube, blogs and fotologs. These new rules constantly changing both mass media and the logic of movement and access to information as to the practices of production, distribution and consumption of audiovisual products. The anthropology of the image implies openness to understanding these complex phenomena.
The objective of this WG is then address and discuss the epistemology and methodology derived from theoretical research linking Photography and Anthropology in multiple formats in order to articulate a critical discussion on various aspects of work in anthropology and account Audiovisual its breadth and scope.
Some lines that are convened GT: Relations between visual representations of culture and otherness, Analysis of emerging global practices constructed using the new tools of analysis and production audiovisual today in all digital formats; Ethnographies film in anthropological research partner, the film / video participatory management and collaborative communication practices in anthropological research; The dynamics of centration / decentration of the subject viewed both from visual anthropology film theory; Ethnographies virtual and experimental research in this field.
GT 16 - Areas and rural populations. Old and new challenges. Culture, economics, organizational forms and policies in the Argentine countryside
Hugo Ratier (hugo.ratier @ gmail.com)
Claudia F. Guebel (claudiaguebel@yahoo.com) Leandro
Etchichury (leandroetchichury@gmail.com)
Commentators: Beatriz Heredia (IFCS-UFRJ), Alicia Villafañe (FACS-UNCPBA), Roberto Ringuelet (FACS-UNCPBA)
Argentine field through changes in all its dimensions (economic social, political, cultural). Is the scene of disputes that show the crisis it faces. New identities emerge, others disappear, and the impact rural issue in the media. The GT we propose aims to collect papers analyzing this situation, but also previous processes that somehow help us understand today. Fit in these tests, subjects such as rural development proposals, endogenous or exogenous the so-called rural tourism, its achievements and problems, changes in village life, farming corporations classic and new, his current role, and the reaction of the people against the imposition of public policies addressed to them.
0 comments:
Post a Comment